| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. Volunteers needed - in Linux [original thread]
CCP Snorlax wrote: Well, the point of a more controlled test was to allow me to get initial feedback before making this all public, but whatever. Ah, I just can delete my posts in that case if you want to.
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.19 15:05:17
|
62. Volunteers needed - in Linux [original thread]
EDIT: I've tried to change the SharedCache location via settings menu by clicking on Open In File Browser and got this instead: http://pastebin.com/d6iCLe6U
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.19 14:37:38
|
63. Volunteers needed - in Linux [original thread]
Okay, I think I'll be wrting down my experience here rather than mailing CCP Snorlax because it may benefit other people. Okay, I downloaded and extracted the launcher, checked eveonline.sh contents just in case (lol steam runtime removing home) ...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.19 14:29:30
|
64. Copy as in copy/paste broken? - in Linux [original thread]
Are you sure it's Ctrl+C that is broken? For me it's Ctrl+V in IGB is what's broken. So I can Ctrl+A Ctrl+C local/cargo/dscan and then have pto RMB+Paste it into aD/evepraisal.
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.17 07:10:07
|
65. Where is the application/profile/settings data stored in linux? - in Linux [original thread]
I think it's in ~/.wine/drive_c/users/user/Local Settings/Aplication Data/CCP/EVE
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.16 04:38:06
|
66. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Sable Blitzmann wrote: You must have started using the Citadel pre-release, Yup, checked acouple of days ago. Sable Blitzmann wrote: Wait for the next release, which will include an automatic migration path (more people are experiencing...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.01 19:56:37
|
67. pyfa 1.18.1 (YC 118.1 release) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
After the latest git pull i get Quote: sqlalchemy.exc.OperationalError: (sqlite3.OperationalError) no such column: fighters.active [SQL: u'SELECT fighters."groupID" AS "fighters_groupID", fighters."fitID" AS "fighters_fitID", fighters."itemID" ...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.05.01 07:37:23
|
68. vsync - tearing and tears - in Linux [original thread]
Bumblebee does have power management. It powers up the card only when it's used. Though latest nvidia drivers separated the kernel module into several pieces which broke the bumblebee powerdown routine because it cannot unload nvidia.ko because it...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.04.22 06:02:25
|
69. vsync - tearing and tears - in Linux [original thread]
Tearing and proprietary nvidia drivers are an old and common story. Personally I either don't experience it or don't notice it. Not sure. Most likely the latter. But I run it through bumblebee. You should google possible solutions with your pers...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.04.21 06:10:26
|
70. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: you can still do this by double clicking the object you want to aproch then using the keep at range key It's easier to single click the approach button than doubleclick a moving frigate in this case.
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.04.18 08:05:21
|
71. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote: It's the approach command. That tripped me up for a while too. Ah, so the new movement interface replaces the old approach command and is unified for both ships and fighters? Neat. Or maybe not. Approach-K...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.04.18 07:45:04
|
72. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Uhh, was out of touch with new eden for a while. What's the new movement interface binding for fighters again? It was M or something. Is it Q now? Because I have module activation binded to the WASD corner, so Q is my F1, and I can't seem to find ...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.04.18 06:50:45
|
73. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: either way if a ship is moving slower than your tracking you apply full dmg if it is in optimal regardless of sig Negative. Let's talk extreme examples, because they are good showcases. Let's take a Naglfar with capit...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.25 07:37:34
|
74. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: thats not at all how missiles work missiles sig is always calculated Perhaps my sentence structure was confusing, but the formula example and the following explanation was for turret damage. Missile damage logic was on...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.25 06:55:13
|
75. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote: except sig a res and tracking don't translate they are used for different parts of the equation. if a ship is not moving faster than your tracking or it is not in fall off then scan res means nothing it has no effect so ...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.25 05:41:24
|
76. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Doddy wrote: Basically you are saying you hate eve. and everything it stands for, nice. Why can they "not possibly fight" these entities? None of the war dec alliances field anything more than 20-30 in thier (rare) structure bashes and those ...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.25 05:11:56
|
77. Sticky:[Citadels Release] Capital Ship changes reaching Singularity! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eeeeh. 40km sig resolution and insane radials feel kinda weird. I understand the underlying math, but IMHO it would be better to do this in more familiar units - that is, scale down the resolution to 400m and adjust the radial accordingly for an...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.25 04:48:58
|
78. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
jepsjeps wrote: From where I can configure these things? IIRC Menu - Business - Structure browser. There you can get the list of all your structures and a list of profiles. You create a new profile and drag&drop your structures of inter...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.24 08:48:03
|
79. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Okay, I got me a character out of corporation and did some permission testing. Well, they don't work. Or are not implemented yet. That is, I have a citadel in a custom profile that had docking permissions set for my corp and everyone (but control...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.24 07:31:27
|
80. Citadels are now on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eli Stan wrote: I'm guessing it'll be through the "Blocked" role in the Groups UI. So if you have a "Citadel Users" group that contains your corp, alliance and blues that you use to allow docking rights, you'll be able to block individuals (or...
- by Torgeir Hekard - at 2016.03.24 04:30:41
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |